Workplace Drama Is a Symptom — Not the Problem
- Leslie Speas
- Feb 27
- 3 min read
Every organization says some version of this:
“We just have too much drama.”
This probably looks like:
Water cooler conversations
Frustration bubbling under the surface
People venting about one another
The meeting after the meeting
Avoided conversations
Escalations that shouldn’t have been escalations
Gossip
And almost every time, someone attributes it to a personality problem.
But here’s what I’ve learned after 30+ years in HR and organizational development:
Drama is rarely a personality problem. It’s usually a clarity and accountability problem.
Drama is a symptom. When I see consistent drama inside an organization, I don’t start with behavior. I start with structure.
Where Drama Actually Comes From:
Drama thrives when performance management systems are weak.
When people don’t know what “good” looks like…
When they aren’t sure who owns what…
When poor performance lingers…
When high performers feel like they’re carrying others…
When managers either avoid conflict or overreact emotionally…
Drama fills the gap. Not because people are bad, but because the system isn't clear, and most human beings do not function well in ambiguity.
Most Organizations Try to Fix Drama at the Surface
Most organizations try to fix surface-level drama by running workshops, talking about respect, reminding people of values, and encouraging them to be "adults."
None of that is wrong. But if the underlying structure hasn’t been strengthened, the drama returns. You cannot coach your way out of systemic confusion.
The Organizational Levers That Actually Reduce Drama
When I work with organizations, we start with strengthening 5 areas that eliminate the conditions drama feeds on based on the CLEAR framework.
1. Clear Communication
Clear expectations, decisions, ownership, and the 'why.' If people are guessing, they are filling in the blanks, and usually not in a good way.
Clear communication = Better understanding and less drama
2. Leverage Understanding
Misinterpretation and judgment within the team fuel unnecessary conflict. Without shared understanding around working styles and strengths, people often assume negative intent.
There’s something called the fundamental attribution error. It’s a fancy term for a very human habit.
When someone else does something we don’t like, we assume it’s a personality flaw. When we do the same thing, we blame the situation.
Someone cuts you off in traffic. “They’re rude." You cut someone off. “I didn’t see them,” or “I had somewhere I needed to be.”
We do this at work all the time. They missed a deadline. “They’re unreliable.” We missed one, and “It’s been a crazy week.”
One of the reasons I love using the Working Genius model and assessment with teams is that it gives language to why people approach work differently. It helps teams understand strengths, blind spots, and natural frustrations — without turning them into character judgments.
Mutual understanding = better teamwork and drama reduction
3. Expect and Equip
This is where many organizations have a gap. They expect accountability, but don’t define it clearly or equip managers to do it.
You cannot hold someone accountable to a standard that was never defined. You cannot expect managers to have hard conversations if they’ve never been taught how.
Strong expectations + trained managers = dramatically less drama
4. Align Roles
Role confusion can create a lot of tension.
Here's what you might hear:
“I thought you were handling that.”
“That’s not my job.”
“Why wasn’t I told?”
"Why is he getting up in my business?"
When ownership and decision rights are clearly defined, escalation drops. When accountability is loose, it’s owned by no one.
Alignment = less friction and drama
5. Reinforce Respect
When high performers are allowed to behave poorly, policies are enforced selectively, or leaders lose their cool, trust erodes. And once trust erodes, people protect themselves through:
Gossip
Silence
Alliances
Passive resistance
That’s drama taking root.
Reinforced respect + consistent standards = better respect and less drama
This Is Why I Built the People & Performance Snapshot & Blueprint
When a client tells me they have “a culture problem” or “too much drama,” I don’t assume it’s cultural.
I run them through the People & Performance Snapshot or Blueprint.
Because what feels like drama is usually one of the things listed above.
The Snapshot surfaces the structural gaps quickly. The Blueprint builds on this across the Employee Experience.
And almost every time, the drama makes more sense once the performance system is visible.
Here’s the Truth Leaders Don’t Always Want to Hear
If drama is widespread, it’s rarely isolated to “that one employee.” It’s usually signaling:
A leadership development gap
A performance management gap
A clarity gap
Or an accountability gap
You can terminate a “dramatic” employee. But if the structure hasn’t changed, the pattern will reappear with someone else because the conditions are still there.




This is great content! Very useful and pertinent. Thank you!